<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge Robert J. Humphreys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-robert-j-humphreys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:12:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Incorporated PSA Extends Parent Insurance Duty&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/03/incorporated-psa-extends-parent-insurance-duty/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/03/incorporated-psa-extends-parent-insurance-duty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Robert J. Humphreys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Appeals affirms the trial court requiring father to reimburse mother for one-half of the cost of son’s medical and dental insurance for as long as the carrier considers him eligible as a dependent; the parties’ property settlement agreement (PSA) does not define “eligible dependent” and a logical interpretation is for father’s obligation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/03/incorporated-psa-extends-parent-insurance-duty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporate Marital Interest Split Upheld&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/16/corporate-marital-interest-split-upheld/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/16/corporate-marital-interest-split-upheld/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Robert J. Humphreys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this divorce of a couple with property interests in companies that own and operate hotels in several states, the trial court did not err in valuing in valuing the companies to account for the hotels and the companies’ other assets such as cash, or in assigning a negative value to two companies because husband [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/16/corporate-marital-interest-split-upheld/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denial of Justifiable Self-Defense Instruction Upheld&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/01/denial-of-justifiable-self-defense-instruction-upheld/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/01/denial-of-justifiable-self-defense-instruction-upheld/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 17:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Robert J. Humphreys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At defendant’s jury trial for robbery and felony-murder, the trial court did not err in declining to give a jury instruction on justifiable self-defense, in addition to the instruction it offered on excusable self-defense; the Court of Appeals affirms defendant’s convictions. Justifiable homicide in self-defense occurs where a person, without any faulty on his part [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/01/denial-of-justifiable-self-defense-instruction-upheld/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals court allows do-over for procedural defaults&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/27/appeals-court-allows-do-over-for-procedural-defaults/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/27/appeals-court-allows-do-over-for-procedural-defaults/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen A. Huff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Robert J. Humphreys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Robert P. Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Stephen R. McCullough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William G. Petty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some procedural errors that may have meant dismissed appeals will no longer be fatal, a divided Virginia Court of Appeals said today in a trio of en banc cases. Specifically, in two cases, the court allowed amendments to retool assignments of error and to specify page references to show an appellate claim had been preserved. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/27/appeals-court-allows-do-over-for-procedural-defaults/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Witness OK for Exhibit Jointly Produced&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/20/one-witness-ok-for-exhibit-jointly-produced/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/20/one-witness-ok-for-exhibit-jointly-produced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Robert J. Humphreys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On rehearing en banc, the Court of Appeals affirms a defendant’s conviction of felony shoplifting based on the trial court’s admission of a list of items stolen from a Family Dollar Store, prepared by a cashier with the store manager’s help, on the testimony of the manager alone. Defendant argues on appeal that the trial [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/20/one-witness-ok-for-exhibit-jointly-produced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Passenger Guilty as Principal in Second Degree&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/27/passenger-guilty-as-principal-in-second-degree/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/27/passenger-guilty-as-principal-in-second-degree/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Robert J. Humphreys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Appeals affirms defendant’s bench trial convictions for robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery:  the record evidence supports finding defendant guilty as a principal in the second degree for his role waiting in the getaway car. Defendant and several other individuals planned to rob a credit union: one individual entered the credit union, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/27/passenger-guilty-as-principal-in-second-degree/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spine Center May Seek Full Payment&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/25/spine-center-may-seek-full-payment/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/25/spine-center-may-seek-full-payment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Robert J. Humphreys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' Comp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A spine center that claims it was underpaid for treatment of an injured worker wins remand of this case, as the insurance carrier did not prove the treating physician who provided claimant’s care had waived the right to receive additional compensation; the Court of Appeals says the carrier did not comply with the terms of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/25/spine-center-may-seek-full-payment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Used iPod and Camera Valued&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/04/used-ipod-and-camera-valued/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/04/used-ipod-and-camera-valued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Robert J. Humphreys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Appeals affirms defendant’s conviction for grand larceny for stealing an iPod and camera from victim’s car; although the iPod was two years old and the camera a year old, the victim’s unrebutted valuation testimony establishes a value exceeding $200 for the stolen items; the trial court did not abuse its discretion in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/04/used-ipod-and-camera-valued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Menacing Dog Required Defense Instructions&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/04/menacing-dog-required-defense-instructions/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/04/menacing-dog-required-defense-instructions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Robert J. Humphreys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Appeals reverses and remands father’s jury trial conviction for felony animal cruelty for shooting a 60-pound dog that threatened his wife and two-year old son; the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on self defense and defense of others was error. One February morning, mother took her two-year-old son to feed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/04/menacing-dog-required-defense-instructions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DNA Hit Supports Rape Conviction&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/04/dna-hit-supports-rape-conviction/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/04/dna-hit-supports-rape-conviction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Robert J. Humphreys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A defendant identified by a 2005 DNA analysis as the perpetrator of a 1987 rape, during a home invasion by two men in which a woman was raped and her grandmother was beaten to death, can be convicted of the rape and related crimes, even though the codefendant was convicted of the rape on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/04/dna-hit-supports-rape-conviction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
