<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge Roger L. Gregory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-roger-l-gregory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:35:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pakistani Forum Not Convenient for Hotel Explosion Suit&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/07/pakistani-forum-not-convenient-for-hotel-explosion-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/07/pakistani-forum-not-convenient-for-hotel-explosion-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Roger L. Gregory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The family of a former naval commander who worked as a private security contractor and who was killed in a 2008 terrorist bombing at the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad, Pakistan, is entitled to heightened deference to their decision to sue Marriott in a Maryland federal court instead of a Pakistani court, and because the district [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/07/pakistani-forum-not-convenient-for-hotel-explosion-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Mandatory Minimum for Crack Defendant&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/03/no-mandatory-minimum-for-crack-defendant/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/03/no-mandatory-minimum-for-crack-defendant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Roger L. Gregory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 4th Circuit says a defendant who got a 10-year mandatory minimum sentence for participation in a crack cocaine distribution conspiracy must be resentenced, given that the threshold amount for the mandatory minimum to apply was raised to 280 grams by the Fair Sentencing Act, prior to defendant’s sentencing. Defendant also challenges the sufficiency of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/03/no-mandatory-minimum-for-crack-defendant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctor Convicted for Unnecessary Stent Procedures&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/24/doctor-convicted-for-unnecessary-stent-procedures/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/24/doctor-convicted-for-unnecessary-stent-procedures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Roger L. Gregory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although proof of defendant doctor’s failure to meet medical standards for performing stent procedures, standing alone, could not sustain defendant’s conviction for health care fraud, additional direct evidence that defendant overstated blockage in numerous cases, misled patients and recorded nonexistent symptoms and attempted to shred subpoenaed patient files, all support his conviction, the 4th Circuit [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/24/doctor-convicted-for-unnecessary-stent-procedures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sentence Enhancement for Duplicates of Child Porn Image&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/02/sentence-enhancement-for-duplicates-of-child-porn-image/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/02/sentence-enhancement-for-duplicates-of-child-porn-image/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 18:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Roger L. Gregory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A defendant who sent duplicates of a limited number of images of child pornography is eligible for a five-level enhancement of his sentence under Section 2G2.2(b)(7)(D) of the federal sentencing guidelines; the 4th Circuit rejects the notion that duplicate images only count as one image and affirms defendant’s sentence. At sentencing, the district court calculated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/02/sentence-enhancement-for-duplicates-of-child-porn-image/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No FCA Claim for Quality Control Complaint&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/29/no-fca-claim-for-quality-control-complaint/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/29/no-fca-claim-for-quality-control-complaint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Roger L. Gregory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An engineer for a government contractor that produces explosive devices does not qualify for protection under the False Claims Act’s anti-retaliation provision for his termination after he reported  alleged fraudulent conduct to the government, as his allegations about quality control did not affect the government customer’s acceptance of the product; the 4th Circuit upholds summary [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/29/no-fca-claim-for-quality-control-complaint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Consent to Tax on Flood Insurance Premiums&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/14/no-consent-to-tax-on-flood-insurance-premiums/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/14/no-consent-to-tax-on-flood-insurance-premiums/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Roger L. Gregory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this dispute between insurance companies that offer flood insurance under a federal program in South Carolina, and a group of South Carolina municipalities that want to assess a business license tax on the carriers based on the flood insurance premiums collected in the municipalities under an arrangement with FEMA, the district court erred in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/14/no-consent-to-tax-on-flood-insurance-premiums/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Detention Illegal for Gas-Station Group&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/26/detention-illegal-for-gas-station-group/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/26/detention-illegal-for-gas-station-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Roger L. Gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search & Seizure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even assuming the initial encounter between a group of uniformed police officers and a group of five men congregated at a gas station was consensual, the officers’ increasing show of authority, immediate seizure of one man’s gun and frisk of the men in the group and seizure of defendant’s ID, quickly changed the encounter to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/26/detention-illegal-for-gas-station-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Access to Order for Twitter Disclosure&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/29/no-access-to-order-for-twitter-disclosure/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/29/no-access-to-order-for-twitter-disclosure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Roger L. Gregory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a government criminal investigation of PFC Bradley Manning’s alleged release of classified documents to WikiLeaks.org, there is no public right to access court orders issued under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d) during the pre-grand jury phased of the investigation, and the 4th Circuit denies a request for disclosure filed by plaintiff Twitter Subscribers. The Stored [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/29/no-access-to-order-for-twitter-disclosure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alien Can’t Qualify for Prison Programs&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/29/alien-cant-qualify-for-prison-programs/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/29/alien-cant-qualify-for-prison-programs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Roger L. Gregory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal inmate who is a permanent resident alien in the U.S. cannot sue for a declaration that he is a U.S. national based his application for citizenship, Selective Service registration and declaration of permanent allegiance to the U.S., in order to qualify for certain prison programs, and the 4th Circuit affirms dismissal of his [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/29/alien-cant-qualify-for-prison-programs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bare-Chested TSA Protest May Be Protected&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/29/bare-chested-tsa-protest-may-be-protected/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/29/bare-chested-tsa-protest-may-be-protected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Roger L. Gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search & Seizure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A young man who protested TSA screening at Richmond International Airport by stripping down to running shorts to reveal the text of the Fourth Amendment across his bare chest may sue TSA officials for allegedly violating his First Amendment rights by calling airport security to arrest him; the 4th Circuit upholds a district court decision [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/29/bare-chested-tsa-protest-may-be-protected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
