<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge Thomas D. Horne</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-thomas-d-horne/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 21:11:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fraud Claim Survives in Modular Home Suit&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/14/fraud-claim-survives-in-modular-home-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/14/fraud-claim-survives-in-modular-home-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Thomas D. Horne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loudoun County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A plaintiff who alleges shoddy craftsmanship, structural deficiencies and an absence of oversight in the installation of a modular home may pursue her fraud claim against a single defendant, but her other claims are barred by the economic loss rule, says a Loudoun County Circuit Court. Plaintiff alleges that on May 5, 2011, she entered [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/14/fraud-claim-survives-in-modular-home-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Developer Wins Limited Declaratory Relief&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/20/developer-wins-limited-declaratory-relief/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/20/developer-wins-limited-declaratory-relief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Thomas D. Horne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loudoun County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this dispute over a developer’s alternative plans to provide water and sewer service to a proposed development after the localities changed plans to share that responsibility, a Loudoun County Circuit Court orders limited declaratory relief and holds that a determination of rights regarding whether the tract may be developed with an Alternative Onsite System [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/20/developer-wins-limited-declaratory-relief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Despite $500 jury award, judge gives consumer lawyer $8K in fees&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/12/despite-500-jury-award-judge-give-consumer-lawyer-8k-in-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/12/despite-500-jury-award-judge-give-consumer-lawyer-8k-in-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Thomas D. Horne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loudoun County Circuit Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Virginia consumer lawyer says a judge’s hefty fee award in an otherwise small-value used car case will encourage lawyers to stand up for consumers even when the stakes are small. Loudoun County Circuit Judge Thomas D. Horne awarded $8,000 to the car buyer’s attorney even though a jury decided the buyer was entitled to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/12/despite-500-jury-award-judge-give-consumer-lawyer-8k-in-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dismissal Denied for Defamation Claims&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/07/dismissal-denied-for-defamation-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/07/dismissal-denied-for-defamation-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Thomas D. Horne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loudoun County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Loudoun County Circuit Court denies a plea in bar filed by defendants to plaintiff’s defamation suit, based on plaintiff’s allegations that defendants arranged for photographs of plaintiff being arrested for embezzlement and for further dissemination of those photos, even though plaintiff, their former residential property manager, was acquitted of the alleged embezzlement. Plaintiff Deanne [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/07/dismissal-denied-for-defamation-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contract case tests birth-injury coverage&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/28/contract-case-tests-birth-injury-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/28/contract-case-tests-birth-injury-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Burke McCahill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Thomas D. Horne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loudoun County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of Virginia News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court of Virginia has agreed to consider whether a medical malpractice insurance policy covers a doctor’s failure to participate in the Virginia birth injury fund as promised to the mother. The coverage dispute arises out of an emotionally wrought case where the distraught mother confronted the doctor and his wife, threatening a violent [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/28/contract-case-tests-birth-injury-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Codicil Language Gives Widow Property&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/20/codicil-language-gives-widow-property/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/20/codicil-language-gives-widow-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Thomas D. Horne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rappahannock County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wills & Trusts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Rappahannock County Circuit Court grants a widow’s motion for partial summary judgment recognizing her right to all testator husband’s personal property and real estate “currently” in the testator’s name, interpreted as property owned at the time of the testator’s death. The relevant provisions of the Codicil paragraph 3 state the testator gives to his [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/20/codicil-language-gives-widow-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parent Has Standing to Challenge Plan&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/parent-has-standing-to-challenge-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/parent-has-standing-to-challenge-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Thomas D. Horne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loudoun County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Loudoun County Circuit Court upholds defendant school board’s redistricting decision against a challenge by parents unhappy with the change required by the revised attendance zones. While the court acknowledges its awareness that petitioner has obtained a hardship exemption for his child for the coming school year and that his child will be remaining at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/parent-has-standing-to-challenge-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>School Board’s Redistricting Plan Upheld&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/school-boards-redistricting-plan-upheld/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/school-boards-redistricting-plan-upheld/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Thomas D. Horne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loudoun County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parents of elementary school students lose their challenge to respondent school board’s redistricting decision contending the board exceeded its authority, acted arbitrarily and abused its discretion in adopting new school attendance zones; the Loudoun County Circuit Court dismisses the parents’ petition. Petitioners contend the board inappropriately considered the effect of the proposed plans on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/school-boards-redistricting-plan-upheld/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Company Can Add Defenses&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/company-can-add-defenses/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/company-can-add-defenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Thomas D. Horne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loudoun County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Loudoun County Circuit Court will allow defendant to file an amended “other and further defenses” despite plaintiff’s complaint that it is prejudiced by the late filing in this litigation over the parties’ license agreement; the court previously has granted plaintiff the right to amend its ad damnum and plaintiff may request an extension of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/company-can-add-defenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Interference with ‘Lawful’ Hunting&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/no-interference-with-lawful-hunting/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/no-interference-with-lawful-hunting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Thomas D. Horne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loudoun County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Loudoun County Circuit Court dismisses a charge under Va. Code § 29.1-521.1  of interfering with lawful hunting against a man who discharged a gun on his own property adjacent to land where four hunters were hunting birds or other game, as several of the hunters did not have written permission to be on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/no-interference-with-lawful-hunting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
