<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge William D. Hamblen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-william-d-hamblen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:27:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nursing home’s fall procedures challenged in death of patient &#8211; Defense Verdict&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/05/24/nursing-home%e2%80%99s-fall-procedures-challenged-in-death-of-patient-defense-verdict/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/05/24/nursing-home%e2%80%99s-fall-procedures-challenged-in-death-of-patient-defense-verdict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 09:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Lawyers Weekly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Verdicts & Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William D. Hamblen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Million-Dollar Defense Verdicts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrongful Death]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=54753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sandra Dunlap, the adult daughter of Mary Suber, age 87, claimed that the defendant nursing home was negligent in its care and treatment of her mother over a nine-month period. The decedent suffered from sacral ulcers, deconditioning and multiple falls. On April 15, 2006, the decedent fell for the sixth time from her wheelchair, breaking [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/05/24/nursing-home%e2%80%99s-fall-procedures-challenged-in-death-of-patient-defense-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Negligence &#8211; P.I. Settlement &#8211; Lawyer Fraud&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/05/04/negligence-pi-settlement-lawyer-fraud-4/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/05/04/negligence-pi-settlement-lawyer-fraud-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 18:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William D. Hamblen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=53855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a split from other Virginia circuit courts, a Prince William County Circuit Court will allow a plaintiff to re-open a personal injury claim settled by a lawyer who apparently pocketed the recovery, but is now serving prison time for spending his clients’ “settlements.” Defendant introduced as an exhibit a copy of a check drawn [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/05/04/negligence-pi-settlement-lawyer-fraud-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>P.I. claim can be reopened&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/04/28/plaintiff-can-re-open-settlement-made-by-now-disbarred-lawyer/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/04/28/plaintiff-can-re-open-settlement-made-by-now-disbarred-lawyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William D. Hamblen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyer Discipline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William County Circuit Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=53347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a split with earlier decisions, a Prince William County judge will allow a plaintiff to re-open a personal injury claim settled by a crooked lawyer who apparently pocketed the recovery. The decision by Circuit Judge William D. Hamblen turns aside defenses by two insurance companies that paid a total of $80,000 in the case [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/04/28/plaintiff-can-re-open-settlement-made-by-now-disbarred-lawyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Price of site excluded in condemnation case &#8211; $1,011,622 Verdict &#160;&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/01/11/price-of-site-excluded-in-condemnation-case-1011622-verdict/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/01/11/price-of-site-excluded-in-condemnation-case-1011622-verdict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Lawyers Weekly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Verdicts & Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eminent Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William D. Hamblen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William County Circuit Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=50361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This condemnation case involved the taking of a 0.51-acre parcel for construction of a grade separation over the railroad tracks across U.S. 29 in Gainesville. The owner had purchased the tract for $250,000 about two years before the taking. The owner argued successfully that the purchase price should be excluded because the likelihood of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/01/11/price-of-site-excluded-in-condemnation-case-1011622-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
