<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge William N. Alexander II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-william-n-alexander-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:57:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Va. Tech verdict likely not the last legal word</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/03/14/jury-finds-virginia-tech-negligent-in-07-shootings/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/03/14/jury-finds-virginia-tech-negligent-in-07-shootings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William N. Alexander II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montgomery County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Tech Shootings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/03/14/jury-finds-virginia-tech-negligent-in-07-shootings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CHRISTIANSBURG, Va. (AP) — After a jury concluded Wednesday that Virginia Tech officials were negligent in their actions leading up to the 2007 deadly mass shooting, the state was giving strong signals of appealing the case while the plaintiff’s lawyer highlighted the significance of the case for future claims against state schools. The verdict in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/03/14/jury-finds-virginia-tech-negligent-in-07-shootings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>University President Out as Defendant&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/02/22/university-president-out-as-defendant/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/02/22/university-president-out-as-defendant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William N. Alexander II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montgomery County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/02/22/university-president-out-as-defendant/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Montgomery County Circuit Court dismisses, on res judicata grounds, Virginia Tech’s university president as a defendant in this negligence suit filed by the estates of two students who were fatally shot on April 16, 2007, but says plaintiffs’ claims against the commonwealth for gross negligence may go to a jury. On April 16, 2009, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/02/22/university-president-out-as-defendant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill: Warrant would be needed for GPS tracking&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/22/bill-warrant-would-be-needed-for-gps-tracking/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/22/bill-warrant-would-be-needed-for-gps-tracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franklin County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William N. Alexander II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/22/bill-warrant-would-be-needed-for-gps-tracking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bill introduced in Congress this month would put an end to a current police practice – use of a GPS tracking device without a warrant to follow a suspect. The measure would force law enforcement to get a judicial OK before using such electronic surveillance. Supporters say the bill protects basic privacy rights. Police [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/22/bill-warrant-would-be-needed-for-gps-tracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GPS Tracking Device Substitute for Surveillance&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/21/gps-tracking-device-substitute-for-surveillance/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/21/gps-tracking-device-substitute-for-surveillance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franklin County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William N. Alexander II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search & Seizure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/21/gps-tracking-device-substitute-for-surveillance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Franklin County Circuit Court denies a defendant’s motion to suppress any evidence obtained against him after a GPS device was attached to his vehicle when it was parked at night on a public street in the city of Bedford, as the device was attached to the outside of the car, there was no evidence [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/21/gps-tracking-device-substitute-for-surveillance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hall: AG should quit Tech shootings case&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/05/hall-ag-should-quit-tech-shootings-case/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/05/hall-ag-should-quit-tech-shootings-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 13:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William N. Alexander II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montgomery County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Tech Shootings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=63007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lawyer for the families suing Virginia Tech over the April 16 shootings says Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli should step aside from representing the school because of his public comments about the lawsuits. Accusing Cuccinelli of jeopardizing a fair trial, Robert T. Hall is asking Judge William Alexander to disqualify the attorney general’s office [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/05/hall-ag-should-quit-tech-shootings-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recusal can be a touchy moment for a lawyer&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/02/28/when-a-judge-needs-to-recuse-himself-it%e2%80%99s-a-touchy-moment-for-a-lawyer/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/02/28/when-a-judge-needs-to-recuse-himself-it%e2%80%99s-a-touchy-moment-for-a-lawyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonial Heights Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General District Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henrico County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Jane Marum Roush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Lee A. Harris Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Timothy J. Hauler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William N. Alexander II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Elizabeth B. Lacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice S. Bernard Goodwyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of Virginia News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=60342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It can be a ticklish and touchy moment for a lawyer: the judge in a case has a conflict and needs to pass the file to a colleague. But whether, and how, to ask a judge to recuse herself can be a major source of heartburn. As it turns out, judges are much more likely [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/02/28/when-a-judge-needs-to-recuse-himself-it%e2%80%99s-a-touchy-moment-for-a-lawyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad damnum, defamation cases settled while on appeal&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/01/07/ad-damnum-defamation-cases-settled-while-on-appeal/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/01/07/ad-damnum-defamation-cases-settled-while-on-appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge James H. Chamblin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge James V. Lane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Robert E. Payne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William N. Alexander II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of Virginia News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=59344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don’t look for rulings from the Supreme Court of Virginia in the Spear ad damnum case or the much-litigated defamation claim of a former Raytheon Technical Services Co. executive. Both have been settled under confidential terms, less than two weeks before a decision was due in the Raytheon case next Thursday and less than a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/01/07/ad-damnum-defamation-cases-settled-while-on-appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another circuit judge rejects ‘Spear’ rationale&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/05/10/another-circuit-judge-rejects-%e2%80%98spear%e2%80%99-rationale/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/05/10/another-circuit-judge-rejects-%e2%80%98spear%e2%80%99-rationale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 20:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Lawyers Weekly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News In Brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge James V. Lane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Robert E. Payne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William N. Alexander II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=54877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Denounced by plaintiffs’ lawyers, the groundbreaking decision in Spear v. Washington Metropolitan Airports Authority has found few friends in the Virginia judiciary. The latest judge to reject the “once-and-for-all ad damnum” rule of Spear is Franklin County Circuit Judge William Alexander. Roanoke lawyer Pete Katt reports Alexander last week rejected a defense motion to dismiss [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/05/10/another-circuit-judge-rejects-%e2%80%98spear%e2%80%99-rationale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alexander grilled by House courts panel&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/02/18/alexander-grilled-by-house-courts-panel/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/02/18/alexander-grilled-by-house-courts-panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William N. Alexander II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Selection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=51805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Franklin County Circuit Judge William N. Alexander II was on his feet for about two hours yesterday listening to comments and answering questions from the judicial panel of the House Courts of Justice Committee. Alexander had lots of support. Among those praising his integrity and judicial ability were the people who usually matter the most [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/02/18/alexander-grilled-by-house-courts-panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alexander is not on list as Assembly votes on judges&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/01/26/alexander-is-not-on-list-as-assembly-votes-on-judges/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/01/26/alexander-is-not-on-list-as-assembly-votes-on-judges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William N. Alexander II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Selection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=51285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Updated 1/29/10 &#8211; 10:20 a.m.) The General Assembly elected most of the incumbent judges up for reappointment last Tuesday but took no action on Franklin County Judge William N. Alexander II. Del. Bill Janis, R-Henrico, chairman of the judicial systems subcommittee of the House Courts of Justice, said Alexander’s name was pulled from consideration because [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/01/26/alexander-is-not-on-list-as-assembly-votes-on-judges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
