<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Orange County Circuit Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/orange-county-circuit-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:12:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Time-Phasing&#8217; Subdivision Law Violated Dillon Rule&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/04/time-phasing-subdivision-law-violated-dillon-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/04/time-phasing-subdivision-law-violated-dillon-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orange County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A local ordinance that allowed the county to require “time-phased” development of a subdivision – four lots every four years – as opposed to approval of the entire 65-lot subdivision in one plan, exceeded the county’s authority under the Virginia Code and an Orange County Circuit Court strikes the ordinance as a violation of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/04/time-phasing-subdivision-law-violated-dillon-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court strikes ‘time-phase’ development rule&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/04/court-strikes-time-phase-development-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/04/court-strikes-time-phase-development-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orange County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A circuit court has struck a “time-phasing” provision of a local law that would have allowed only one subdivision of a parcel every four years. At the rate required by the Orange County ordinance, it could take 40 years to develop a 175-acre parcel near Barboursville, and the owners said they would be hindered in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/04/court-strikes-time-phase-development-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plaintiff’s symptoms stem from sleep apnea, defense argues &#8211; $100,000 Verdict&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/08/22/plaintiff%e2%80%99s-symptoms-stem-from-sleep-apnea-defense-argues-100000-verdict/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/08/22/plaintiff%e2%80%99s-symptoms-stem-from-sleep-apnea-defense-argues-100000-verdict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Lawyers Weekly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Verdicts & Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William H. Shaw III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orange County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/08/18/plaintiff%e2%80%99s-symptoms-stem-from-sleep-apnea-defense-argues-100000-verdict/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On July 17, 2006, the plaintiff was stopped on Route 20 at Pine State Road, waiting to make a left turn. Another vehicle was stopped behind him. The defendant was traveling at 45 mph when he rear-ended the second stopped vehicle, pushing it into the plaintiff’s car. Plaintiff drove home from the accident scene and, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/08/22/plaintiff%e2%80%99s-symptoms-stem-from-sleep-apnea-defense-argues-100000-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murder suspect liable in civil mediation&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/09/27/murder-suspect-liable-in-civil-mediation/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/09/27/murder-suspect-liable-in-civil-mediation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Daniel R. Bouton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orange County Circuit Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=57316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The suspicion that Donna Somerville poisoned her husband in their Orange County horse country home has lingered for almost nine years, despite her acquittal in a criminal trial. Earlier this month, creative lawyering helped produce an uneasy truce between Somerville and the three daughters of Hamilton Somerville Jr. from his first marriage. The daughters have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/09/27/murder-suspect-liable-in-civil-mediation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorist alleges back injury in Orange County rear-ender &#8211; $450,000 Settlement&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/07/26/motorist-alleges-back-injury-in-orange-county-rear-ender-450000-settlement/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/07/26/motorist-alleges-back-injury-in-orange-county-rear-ender-450000-settlement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Lawyers Weekly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Verdicts & Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orange County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=56057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Aug. 7, 2006, the 48-year-old plaintiff was stopped in a line of traffic when he was rear-ended by defendant Kenneth Rauch, who was operating his own pickup truck within the scope of his employment with defendant WIMCO. As a result of that impact, the plaintiff was forced into the rear of the van in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/07/26/motorist-alleges-back-injury-in-orange-county-rear-ender-450000-settlement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zoning &#8211; Special Use Permit &#8211; Wal-Mart Store &#8211; National Trust Standing&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/05/11/zoning-special-use-permit-wal-mart-store-national-trust-standing/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/05/11/zoning-special-use-permit-wal-mart-store-national-trust-standing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Daniel R. Bouton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orange County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=54566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although plaintiff National Trust for Historic Preservation is appropriately concerned about the potential impact of a Wal-Mart store on the Wilderness Battlefield property, under Virginia Supreme Court precedent, the Trust’s general concern does not give it standing to challenge defendant county’s issuance of a Special Use Permit; but the Orange County Circuit Court recognizes standing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/05/11/zoning-special-use-permit-wal-mart-store-national-trust-standing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
