<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Partnerships</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/partnerships/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:24:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Partnership Dissolved for Frustration of Purpose&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/01/partnership-dissolved-for-frustration-of-purpose/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/01/partnership-dissolved-for-frustration-of-purpose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 16:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Elizabeth B. Lacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/01/partnership-dissolved-for-frustration-of-purpose/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A brother and sister who were co-trustees and held interests in a real estate development partnership set up by their father have been unable for years to agree on trust matters, causing the trust to incur additional expenses because of these disagreements, and the Virginia Supreme Court upholds judicial dissolution of the partnership, based on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/01/partnership-dissolved-for-frustration-of-purpose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For Law Firm Dissolution, Accounting Comes First&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/09/20/for-law-firm-dissolution-accounting-comes-first/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/09/20/for-law-firm-dissolution-accounting-comes-first/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice William C. Mims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/09/20/for-law-firm-dissolution-accounting-comes-first/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In sorting out the interests of three former associates who bought into a law partnership in 1999 with defendant partner, after all four lawyers moved on to another firm, a circuit court erred in failing to perform the accounting that is “necessarily inherent in a winding up” of the firm’s business before ordering judicial dissolution [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/09/20/for-law-firm-dissolution-accounting-comes-first/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Partnerships &#8211; Dissolution Agreement &#8211; RULPA&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/10/05/partnerships-dissolution-agreement-rulpa/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/10/05/partnerships-dissolution-agreement-rulpa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Leslie M. Alden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=57576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because a general partner in this family real estate partnership concurrently failed to admit a new general partner and withdrew as sole general partner, the partnership was left without a general partner, and her actions in 2003 triggered the dissolution of the partnership, says a Fairfax Circuit Court. In 1994, Verlin W. Smith and Maryan [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/10/05/partnerships-dissolution-agreement-rulpa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Partnerships &#8211; Foreign LP &#8211; Virginia Dissolution&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/02/01/partnerships-foreign-lp-virginia-dissolution/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/02/01/partnerships-foreign-lp-virginia-dissolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Mary Jane Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partnerships]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=51529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this first-impression case, a Norfolk Circuit Court says it has no jurisdiction to dissolve a Georgia limited partnership, even though none of the LP’s assets &#8211; a $20 million brokerage account &#8211; or its family-feud partners have any connection to Georgia and defendants waited until the eve of trial to seek dismissal. Defendants argue [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/02/01/partnerships-foreign-lp-virginia-dissolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
