<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Qui Tam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/qui-tam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:12:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Qui Tam action alleges military contractor inflated cost estimates &#8211; $18,161,393 Settlement&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/06/18/qui-tam-action-alleges-military-contractor-inflated-cost-estimates-18161393-settlement/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/06/18/qui-tam-action-alleges-military-contractor-inflated-cost-estimates-18161393-settlement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Lawyers Weekly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Verdicts & Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Million-Dollar Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qui Tam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=67795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Calnet CFO Kim Chao filed a qui tam action in federal court, alleging false claims on three different “cost plus” contracts with the United States Department of the Army. In a “cost plus” arrangement, a contractor is paid for the costs (i.e., the overhead) it incurs in association with the particular contract, plus a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/06/18/qui-tam-action-alleges-military-contractor-inflated-cost-estimates-18161393-settlement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drug company pays $313M in False Claims Act case&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/09/29/drug-company-pays-313m-to-settle-qui-tam-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/09/29/drug-company-pays-313m-to-settle-qui-tam-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Million-Dollar Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qui Tam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=57408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Gobble thought he had found his dream job as a sales rep for Forest Pharmaceuticals Inc. working out of Glen Allen, just outside Richmond. But he was bothered by what appeared to be violations of the company “Standards of Business Ethics and Conduct,” which barred kickbacks and payments to physicians to prescribe Forest’s products. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/09/29/drug-company-pays-313m-to-settle-qui-tam-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
