<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Securities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/securities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:24:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>School Stock Fraud Case Advances&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/25/school-stock-fraud-case-advances/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/25/school-stock-fraud-case-advances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Charles James Maxfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/25/school-stock-fraud-case-advances/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An investor who thought his $200,000 payment to defendants was buying 40,000 shares in C2 Future stock that would allow expansion of an educational company into Korea, not “office expenses for existing schools,” can sue defendants for an alleged fraudulent scheme in violation of the Virginia Securities Act; the Fairfax Circuit Court denies defendants’ summary [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/25/school-stock-fraud-case-advances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank is ‘Customer’ for FINRA Arbitration&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/09/20/bank-is-%e2%80%98customer%e2%80%99-for-finra-arbitration/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/09/20/bank-is-%e2%80%98customer%e2%80%99-for-finra-arbitration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Donald W. Lemons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/09/20/bank-is-%e2%80%98customer%e2%80%99-for-finra-arbitration/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A securities broker who is suing a bank that terminated him as sales manager of its affiliated investment company may compel arbitration of the salary dispute under the financial industry’s Customer Code; the Supreme Court of Virginia says, on this first-impression issue, that the bank qualifies as a “customer” under the Customer Code. The bank [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/09/20/bank-is-%e2%80%98customer%e2%80%99-for-finra-arbitration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
