Quantcast
Home (page 15)

Tag Archives: U.S. District Court – Eastern District

Company Owner Can Sue for Fraudulent Inducement (access required)

Plaintiff small business, founded by a former service technician for defendant Pitney Bowes Inc., can sue PBI for fraudulent inducement regarding a dealer agreement the parties had for plaintiff to service PBI products, that defendant allegedly used to damage plaintiff’s ...

Read More »

Lawyer could not sue bankruptcy counsel (access required)

ADR Discussion Meeting Attorneys FEA

A patent attorney who was unhappy with his bankruptcy lawyer’s performance cannot sue the lawyer because his malpractice claim belongs to the bankruptcy estate, an Alexandria federal judge said on April 14. Embroiled in litigation from a failed venture with ...

Read More »

No Finding of Confusion Over Mark (access required)

In plaintiff Virginia company’s suit alleging defendants, a Taiwanese corporation and two Washington state corporations, infringed plaintiff’s registered mark “VIVE” for its software, by marketing an “HTC Vive” headset, an Alexandria U.S. District Court grants summary judgment for defendant, as ...

Read More »

Expert Excluded on Mark ‘Confusion’ Claim (access required)

In plaintiff Virginia company’s suit alleging defendants, a Taiwanese corporation and two Washington state corporations, infringed on plaintiff’s registered mark “VIVE” for its software, by marketing an “HTC Vive” headset, an Alexandria U.S. District Court excludes plaintiff’s proffered expert’s opinions, ...

Read More »

Internet Sales Allow Virginia Federal Suit (access required)

In plaintiffs’ suit alleging a Texas company unlawfully used plaintiff’s engraving designs, trademarks and products lines for miniaturized bourbon barrels that allow individuals to age and flavor their own liquor, defendant’s purposeful conduct – setting up an interactive website accessible ...

Read More »