Quantcast
Home (page 197)

Tag Archives: U.S. District Court – Eastern District

Carrier Must Defend Under ‘Garage Operations’ Clause (access required)

Although the driver of a car owned by Cowles Nissan was intoxicated when he struck and killed a pedestrian, an Alexandria U.S. District Court predicts the Virginia Supreme Court would interpret an insurance policy’s “garage operations provision” to require the ...

Read More »

Title VII Suit OK After § 1983 Claim (access required)

A female firefighter’s Title VII claim for hostile environment and employment discrimination by the county fire department is not barred by res judicata just because the Alexandria U.S. District Court dismissed plaintiff’s earlier suit alleging sexual harassment and employment discrimination; ...

Read More »

Six-Year Limitations Bars Challenge to Regs (access required)

An Alexandria U.S. District Court dismisses plaintiff corporation’s challenge to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s adoption in 2004 of two federal regulations the corporation says have hindered its ability to obtain and present relevant evidence in the course of ...

Read More »

Permanent Injunction Against Infringement (access required)

In this litigation involving patents-in-suit relating to electronic sourcing systems, which allow prospective buyers to locate items to buy from multiple electronic catalogs, a Richmond U.S. District Court grants plaintiff’s motion for a permanent injunction. Trial commenced on Jan. 4, ...

Read More »

Court Denies Stay of Injunction (access required)

In this litigation involving patents-in-suit relating to electronic sourcing systems, which allow prospective buyers to locate items to buy from multiple electronic catalogs, a Richmond U.S. District Court denies defendant software company’s motion for a stay of permanent injunction. The ...

Read More »

Law Firm Must Discuss Malpractice Policy (access required)

In a pro se plaintiff’s suit under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, a Richmond U.S. District Court denies plaintiff’s motion to quash defendant’s subpoena to testify and produce documents related to plaintiff’s relationship with a law firm whose malpractice ...

Read More »