Quantcast
Home / Opinion Digests / Permit Applicants Were Not ‘Similarly Situated’ (access required)

Permit Applicants Were Not ‘Similarly Situated’ (access required)

A landowner who was denied an extension of its conditional use permit allowing construction of a sign for a proposed outlet mall was not “similarly situated” to a developer who was granted an extension of the same CUP allowing construction of another sign for the proposed mall; a divided Supreme Court of Virginia upholds the ...

Leave a Reply