Quantcast
Home / Opinion Digests / Criminal Law / Claim that instructions were confusing fails (access required)

Claim that instructions were confusing fails (access required)

A defendant’s claim that jury instructions in his trial for forcible sodomy and sexual battery were confusing was speculation. Background On Oct. 2, 2015, the victim met the appellant at a bar in Fredericksburg around 11:30 p.m. The victim had been drinking wine at the friend’s house and had two drinks at the bar. About 1:30 a.m. on ...