Second drug charge was not double jeopardy

Where defendant pleaded guilty to possessing heroin with intent to distribute in the city of Fredericksburg, a later charge of possessing heroin with intent to distribute, second offense, in Spotsylvania County did not violate double jeopardy principles. Defendant complains that the second charge arose from the same incident. However, the proofs required for each charge were ...

Enter your user name and password in the fields above to gain access to the subscriber content on this site.

Your subscription includes one set of login credentials for your exclusive use. Security features have been integrated on this site: If someone signs in with your credentials while you are logged in, the site will automatically close your ongoing login and you will lose access at that time.

To inquire about group subscriptions or an enterprise site license for your firm, contact Jeremy LaChance with this form.

If you feel your login credentials are being used by a second party, contact customer service at 877-615-9536 for assistance in changing your password.

Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here.

Forgot your password?

Virginia Lawyers Weekly VA Lawyers Weekly

Second drug charge was not double jeopardy

Related Articles

Second drug charge was not double jeopardy

Share this:

Related Articles