Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Opinion Digests / Affirmative defenses not subject to ‘Twombly’ and ‘Iqbal’ (access required)

Affirmative defenses not subject to ‘Twombly’ and ‘Iqbal’ (access required)

Although prior decisions applied the pleading standards in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), to affirmative defenses, the recent trend declines to do so. But, even under the less-stringent standards of Rule 8(b), the unclean hands, estoppel and inequitable conduct affirmative defenses lacked factual ...