Quantcast
Home / Opinion Digests / Criminal Law / No double jeopardy violation in child pornography case (access required)

No double jeopardy violation in child pornography case (access required)

Appellant’s convictions and sentences for production of child pornography and possession of child pornography do not violate double jeopardy principles. Possession of child pornography is not a lesser-included offense of production of child pornography. Background Appellant was 17 years old when he recorded a 16-year-old girl performing a sex act on him. The same night, he sent ...