Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Opinion Digests / Parol evidence needed to explain confusing contract (access required)

Parol evidence needed to explain confusing contract (access required)

Where a contracting party moved for reconsideration of the court’s order denying its motion to dismiss, the motion was denied because parol evidence was needed to provide context to the confusing and contradictory contract terms. Background Fifth Third Bank N.A., and ePlus Group Inc., filed separate causes of action against IBM for breach of contract and breach ...