Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Opinion Digests / Guarantor wasn’t a ‘necessary and indispensable party’ (access required)

Guarantor wasn’t a ‘necessary and indispensable party’ (access required)

Where the defendant was sued for allegedly breaching conditions of a commercial lease relating to the construction and operation of a fitness club, and its corporate parent allegedly guaranteed the defendant’s performance, that didn’t make the corporate parent a “necessary and indispensable” party. Background Clarendon Regency IV LLC generally alleging that Equinox Clarendon Inc. breached certain conditions ...