Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Opinion Digests / Criminal Law / Insufficient evidence for larceny conviction (access required)

Insufficient evidence for larceny conviction (access required)

Appellant’s grand larceny conviction is reversed because the indictment charges that the theft occurred months after the date of a surveillance video offered as evidence of the theft. Background The indictment charged that on Oct. 19, 2019, appellant Goldman stole tools from a construction site. S.B. Ballard Construction was the general contractor. At trial, Chambers, a Ballard ...