Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Verdicts & Settlements / Jury sides with woman injured in rear-end collision — $300,000 verdict

Jury sides with woman injured in rear-end collision — $300,000 verdict

Type of action: Auto accident

Injuries alleged: Concussion with headaches, photosenstitvity, difficult with concentration and neck pain

Name of case: Hicks v. Johnson

Court: Henrico County Circuit Court

Case no.: CL20002597

Tried before: Jury

Name of judge or mediator: Judge Richard S. Wallerstein Jr.

Date resolved: 2/1/2023

Special damages: $34,520.60 in past medicals; $157,635 in contested future damages

Demand: $350,000

Offer: $50,000



Verdict or settlement: Verdict

Amount: $300,000

Attorneys for plaintiff: Jonathan E. Halperin and Darrell J. Getman, Glen Allen

Description of case: On Feb. 1, 2023, plaintiff Melanie Hicks secured a jury verdict in Henrico County against the defendant, Luke Johnson, in a case involving a rear-end motor vehicle collision. On April 23, 2018, defendant was driving a Ford F250 pickup truck when he rear-ended Hicks’ SUV at the intersection of Staples Mill Road and Old Staples Mill Road in Henrico County. The impact of the collision produced very little damage to the vehicles — only a few scuff marks were visible on the rear bumper of Hicks’ vehicle. Plaintiff alleged that Hicks sustained a mild traumatic brain injury, or MTBI, from the collision, which caused Hicks to experience headaches, neck pain, photosensitivity and difficulty in concentration in the four-plus years since the collision took place. Hicks worked a full day on the date of the collision, only seeking medical treatment at Patient First when she returned home in the evening.

Plaintiff presented $34,520.60 in past medical bills and $157,635 in hotly contested future bills. Plaintiff argued that she would require occipital and facial nerve-block injections for the rest of her life. The need for these injections was supported by the testimony of Dr. Anthony Julius, plaintiff’s treating neurologist.

The defense disputed plaintiff’s future medical treatment through an expert neurosurgeon, Donald G. Hope, M.D., from Northern Virginia. Hope testified that plaintiff did not sustain any brain injury from the collision. However, during cross examination, Hope admitted that he has earned well over $7 million in the past six years working for defense lawyers. In closing, plaintiff asked the jury to accept Julius’ testimony and reject the testimony of the “$7 million man.” The jury returned a verdict of $300,000 in approximately 55 minutes.

Jonathan E. Halperin, plaintiff’s counsel, provided case information.