Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Plaintiff injured in crash with oncoming vehicle — $235,000 settlement

Virginia Lawyers Weekly//September 25, 2023

Plaintiff injured in crash with oncoming vehicle — $235,000 settlement

Virginia Lawyers Weekly//September 25, 2023//

Listen to this article

Type of action: Auto accident

Injuries alleged: Cervical herniated discs resulting in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a future spinal cord stimulator recommended; lower back/lumbar sprain/strain; concussion

Name of case: Christian v. Williams

Court: Richmond Circuit Court

Case no.: Cl22002956-00

Date resolved: 6/7/2023

Special damages: $150,282.23 in past medical bills; $11,900 in past wage loss; $597,714 in future medical bills

Verdict or settlement: Settlement


Amount: $235,000

Attorney for plaintiff: Tara L. Tighe, Arlington

Description of case: Plaintiff entered an intersection on a green light waiting for traffic to clear to make a left turn. His light turned yellow, then red and all oncoming traffic stopped. Plaintiff proceeded to complete his left turn when he was hit by an oncoming vehicle in the last lane of traffic. Plaintiff’s vehicle was spun around 270 degrees and all airbags deployed. Defendant testified during deposition that her light was yellow when she entered the intersection. Police body camera footage and the defendant’s mother’s testimony contradicted the defendant’s version and suggested her light was red when she entered the intersection. The defense alleged plaintiff was contributorily negligent.

The defendant was uninsured and the case was defended by plaintiff’s two uninsured motorist carriers.

Plaintiff presented to the emergency room the following day and was diagnosed with a concussion, lumbar sprains/strains and cervical sprains/strains with radiating numbness and tingling. Plaintiff received an MRI within three weeks which revealed herniated discs and resulted in an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion six months after the crash. Despite successful surgery, plaintiff continued to have ongoing pain coming from his neck. Plaintiff was recommended for a spinal cord stimulator due to his pain levels being 6-10/10. Plaintiff was 29 at the time of the crash.

The defendant argued that the plaintiff had a lifelong history of neck pain and that the injuries were not related to the crash.

Both liability and causation would have been contested at trial. The matter settled before defendant’s experts were disclosed.

Plaintiff’s counsel Tara L. Tighe provided case information.


Verdicts & Settlements

See All Verdicts & Settlements

Opinion Digests

See All Digests