Google to pay $68M to settle assistant privacy lawsuit
Reuters//January 27, 2026//
Summary
- Google agreed to a $68 million settlement over Google Assistant privacy claims
- Users alleged conversations were recorded after false voice-activation triggers
- Settlement covers affected users dating back to May 18, 2016
- Google denied wrongdoing but settled to avoid litigation risks
Google agreed to pay $68 million to settle a lawsuit claiming that its voice-activated assistant spied inappropriately on smartphone users, violating their privacy.
A preliminary class action settlement was filed on Jan. 23 in the San Jose, California federal court, and requires approval by U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman.
Smartphone users accused Google, a unit of Alphabet, of illegally recording and disseminating private conversations after Google Assistant was triggered, in order to send them targeted advertising.
Google Assistant is designed to react when people use “hot words” such as “Hey Google” or “Okay Google,” similar to Apple’s Siri.
Users objected to receiving ads after Google Assistant misperceived what they said as hot words, known as “false accepts.”
Apple reached a similar $95 million settlement with smartphone users in December 2024.
Google denied wrongdoing, but settled to avoid the risk, cost and uncertainty of litigation, court papers show. The Mountain View, California-based company declined to comment on Jan. 26.
The settlement covers people who bought Google devices or were subjected to false accepts since May 18, 2016, court papers show.
Lawyers for plaintiffs may seek up to one-third of the settlement fund, or about $22.7 million, for legal fees.
Related Articles
Verdicts & Settlements
- Medical Malpractice – Death from cancer followed stomach pain misdiagnosis
- Workers’ Compensation – Seasonal worker paralyzed in tobacco baler accident
- Medical Malpractice – Jurors side with doctor in suit over rescue surgery
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Unicycle rider dies after being hit by car
- Premises Liability – Delivery driver injured by porch decking collapse
- Premises Liability – Fall down stairs at resort results in injuries, death
- Medical Malpractice – Jurors side with doctor in suit over rescue surgery
- Workers’ Compensation- Seasonal worker paralyzed in tobacco baler accident
- Medical Malpractice- Death from cancer followed stomach pain misdiagnosis
- Workers’ Compensation – Struck in face by forklift, woman suffers brain injury
- Negligence and Tort – Group home resident falls, sustaining femur fracture
Opinion Digests
- Criminal – Allen charge wasn’t abuse of discretion
- Evidence – Expert’s exclusion from trial deemed harmless
- Parent and child – Mother held in contempt for violating visitation order
- Criminal – Court refuses to continue trial despite missing witness
- Criminal – Meth defendant wasn’t entitled to sentencing safety valve
- Tort – Comments about plaintiff were protected opinions
- Real Property – Condo unit owner challenges expansion plans
- Criminal – Woman convicted of endangering her children’s lives
- Negligence – Neighbors ordered to pay $300,000 for boundary wall collapse
- Fraud – Court vacates fraud judgment against home sellers
- Employment – Former employee’s claims against ODU are narrowed
- Civil Rights – Civil rights suit was filed too late







