Trump opposes letting E. Jean Carroll collect $5 million award, cites Supreme Court bid
Reuters//July 8, 2026//
Summary:
- Trump lawyers seek delay of $5 million award disbursement
- Supreme Court declined to hear Trump appeal on June 29
- $5.8 million held in court-supervised escrow account
July 8 (Reuters) – Lawyers for U.S. President Donald Trump have asked a federal judge not to authorize a disbursement of a multi-million dollar damages award to magazine writer E. Jean Carroll to satisfy a 2023 civil verdict in which a jury found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming her.
In a filing late on Tuesday night in Manhattan federal court, Trump’s lawyers said Carroll should wait until the U.S. Supreme Court hears Trump’s renewed bid to overturn the $5 million verdict, which has grown to about $5.8 million including interest.
The lawyers said Trump would be irreparably harmed and face “unrecoverable loss” if Carroll fulfills her stated intention to give away the money, because once she does the money likely could not be recovered.
They also said letting Carroll recover, only to have the Supreme Court grant a rehearing, would “undermine public confidence in an orderly judicial process” at a time when Trump’s supporters and some critics, according to his lawyers, voice “concerns about politically motivated weaponization of the legal system.”
The $5.8 million is being held in a court-supervised escrow account.
A spokesperson for Carroll declined to comment on Wednesday.
The Supreme Court declined to hear Trump’s appeal on June 29, and none of the nine justices noted dissents.
Trump submitted a petition to rehear his appeal on Wednesday. The Supreme Court rarely takes up appeals after initially turning them down.
TRUMP PLANS SECOND APPEAL
Carroll, 82, and Trump, 80, have battled in court for nearly seven years, after the former Elle magazine advice columnist accused him of raping her around 1996 in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan.
Trump has rejected Carroll’s claims as a “hoax” and “con job,” denying he knew her and saying she made up the alleged rape to help sell her memoir.
Jurors awarded Carroll the $5 million based on a Trump denial in 2022, though they did not find that Trump raped her.
A different jury in January 2024 ordered Trump to pay Carroll $83.3 million in damages based on his original denial in 2019, which occurred during his first White House term. Trump has said he deserves presidential immunity for that denial.
The Manhattan-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to throw out the $83.3 million verdict last September.
Trump plans to appeal that verdict to the Supreme Court, and his lawyers said a successful appeal could undermine the basis for the $5 million verdict.
Carroll has accused Trump of stalling to avoid accountability. In a June 30 court filing, her lawyers said that “it is time for him to pay Carroll.”
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Will Dunham)
Related Articles
Verdicts & Settlements
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Unicycle rider dies after being hit by car
- Premises Liability – Delivery driver injured by porch decking collapse
- Premises Liability – Fall down stairs at resort results in injuries, death
- Medical Malpractice – Jurors side with doctor in suit over rescue surgery
- Workers’ Compensation- Seasonal worker paralyzed in tobacco baler accident
- Medical Malpractice- Death from cancer followed stomach pain misdiagnosis
- Workers’ Compensation – Struck in face by forklift, woman suffers brain injury
- Negligence and Tort – Group home resident falls, sustaining femur fracture
- Medical Malpractice – Nursing facility patient dies after fracturing ankle in fall
- Medical Malpractice- Patient has bladder injury during colostomy reversal
- Premises Liability- Apartment guest burned by gas grill spewing fire
Opinion Digests
- The Most Important Opinions, January-June 2026
- Criminal – Court of Appeals wrongly vacated murder conviction
- Tort – U.Va. prevails on former professor’s claims
- Constitutional – Company’s due process claim against county is dismissed
- Administrative – Plaintiffs’ effort to enjoin ITC proceeding fails
- Patent and trademark – Amazon patent infringement suit transferred to New Jersey
- Tort – Chesterfield County dismissed from wrongful death suit
- Consumer Protection – Lawsuit over kratom survives motion to dismiss
- Criminal – Defendant convicted of attempted sexual exploitation of a child
- Evidence – Motion to exclude transmission expert is rejected
- Damages – Court awards pre-judgment interest following parties’ acquiescence
- Employment – Court approves overtime wage collective action settlement







