Quantcast

Tag Archives: Civil Procedure

Single action improper against online counterfeit defendants (access required)

The actions of 28 Chinese entities selling counterfeit goods on the internet did not arise out of the same transaction or occurrence, and they must be severed into individual suits. Background The Defendants, 28 unrelated individuals and entities located in the People’s ...

Read More »

Appeal of jurisdictional discovery order was frivolous (access required)

Defendants who asked the court to dismiss the case against them for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction had no basis to appeal the court’s denial without prejudice. The court had denied the motion on procedural grounds and ordered jurisdictional discovery to ...

Read More »

Single action improper against online counterfeit defendants (access required)

The actions of 28 Chinese entities selling counterfeit goods on the internet did not arise out of the same transaction or occurrence, and they must be severed into individual suits. Background The Defendants, 28 unrelated individuals and entities located in the People’s ...

Read More »

Appeal of jurisdictional discovery order was frivolous (access required)

Defendants who asked the court to dismiss the case against them for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction had no basis to appeal the court’s denial without prejudice. The court had denied the motion on procedural grounds and ordered jurisdictional discovery to ...

Read More »

Judgment final as to co-defendant who didn’t appeal (access required)

One of two defendants appealing a $24,000 judgment against them cannot add the other defendant to the appeal. General district court judgments are final as to parties who note no appeal. Background In 2016, Denise Johnson rear-ended Defendant Milford Smith, ...

Read More »

Agency not required to serve decision on unnamed party (access required)

The court lacks jurisdiction to consider this administrative appeal. The City of Norfolk, the petitioner, was not a named party in the agency’s adjudication and submitted no public comments. Thus, it was not entitled to service of the final decision ...

Read More »

EDVA: Plaintiff’s “unclean hands” irrelevant to antitrust relief (access required)

Holding that “unclean hands” is not a defense to equitable relief in antitrust, the court excluded the defendant’s evidence that the plaintiff misappropriated its trade secrets, finding such evidence not probative under Federal Rule of Evidence 402. Background Plaintiff Steves ...

Read More »

EDVA: Single action improper against online counterfeit defendants (access required)

The actions of 28 Chinese entities selling counterfeit goods on the internet did not arise out of the same transaction or occurrence, and they must be severed into individual suits. Background The Defendants, 28 unrelated individuals and entities located in the People’s ...

Read More »

SCV: Pro se litigant must pay county’s legal fees (access required)

After “only the latest in a string of frivolous lawsuits” against Loudoun County and its various departments, a pro se litigant must pay the county more than $4,000 in attorneys’ fees. She is also barred from bringing more petitions against the County without ...

Read More »

Va. Cir.: Judgment final as to co-defendant who didn’t appeal (access required)

One of two defendants appealing a $24,000 judgment against them cannot add the other defendant to the appeal. General district court judgments are final as to parties who note no appeal. Background In 2016, Denise Johnson rear-ended Defendant Milford Smith, ...

Read More »