Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Judge Frank K. Friedman

Mar 28, 2023

Packing car for trip was use of motor vehicle

Where a gust of wind pushed a luggage cart into appellee while he was loading luggage into his car for a trip, his injuries arose “out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle,” and he was “‘in or upon, entering, or alighting from’ the vehicle when he was struck[.]” The trial court […]

Mar 27, 2023

Character of community nixes homestay exception

A county board of supervisors correctly considered neighborhood character as part of public welfare when it denied a homeowner’s application to rent five of his guestrooms on a short-term basis known as “homestays,” the Court of Appeals of Virginia has held. The homeowner argued that consideration of neighborhood character as a component of “the public […]

Mar 20, 2023

No jurisdiction to rule on attorney ethics complaint

The circuit court correctly ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to hear appellant’s ethics complaint against an attorney. Overview Appellant Spanos filed an ethics complaint in circuit court, seeking to have Taylor’s law license revoked. “Spanos asserted that the circuit court had jurisdiction under Code § 54.1-3915 to grant the relief he requested. Taylor filed an […]

Mar 20, 2023

No jurisdiction to rule on attorney ethics complaint

The circuit court correctly ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to hear appellant’s ethics complaint against an attorney. Overview Appellant Spanos filed an ethics complaint in circuit court, seeking to have Feinmel’s law license revoked. “Spanos asserted that the circuit court had jurisdiction under Code § 54.1-3915 to grant the relief he requested. Feinmel filed an […]

Feb 16, 2023

Suspended sentences were improperly revoked

Where appellant probationer’s drug test revealed fentanyl use, the trial court incorrectly suspended her sentences on two charges and imposed a 364-day active sentence. The use of fentanyl was appellant’s first technical probation violation. Therefore, under the relevant statute, the trial court could not “not impose a sentence of a term of active incarceration upon […]

Jan 12, 2023

Sufficient evidence to convict for firearm offense

Where appellant was convicted for possession of a firearm by a violent convicted felon, the trial court properly denied his motion to suppress. Traffic stop Kelly, appellant’s brother, drove his car into a gas station. Griffin was his passenger. Appellant pulled in alongside Kelly’s car. Detective Ring was checking license plates of cars leaving a […]

Jan 5, 2023

Sufficient evidence of victim’s age in sex crimes case

Where appellant was convicted of several sex crimes involving a child under 13 years old, there is sufficient evidence to support a finding that the child was less than 13 when the offenses occurred. Reasonable inference “There was sufficient evidence to find that O.B. was under the age of thirteen at the time of the […]

Dec 8, 2022

Sufficient evidence supports rape conviction

Where appellant argues that his rape conviction should be reversed based on insufficient evidence and the commonwealth’s failure to disprove his alibi, the trial court was free to credit the victim’s testimony and discredit alibi testimony from appellant’s fiancée. Victim’s testimony “G.T. testified that appellant drove her to an alley so narrow that she could […]

Nov 29, 2022

Savings certificates were joint property

The trial court properly interpreted the parties’ premarital agreement to provide that husband’s savings certificates, which were his separate property before the marriage, became joint property when he titled them in both parties’ names after the marriage, and did not become his separate property again when he later removed wife’s name from them. The trial […]

Nov 14, 2022

Sufficient evidence of intent in malicious wounding case

In this malicious wounding case, the trial court correctly resolved conflicting testimony and credited the victim’s account of the evidence. The court correctly found that appellant acted with malice and thus had the necessary intent to be convicted. Appellant’s conviction is affirmed. Background According to Cosby, appellant King’s victim, Cosby and Branham had a “negative […]

Nov 8, 2022

Evidence supports common plan in larceny case

Where appellant was convicted after a bench trial of conspiracy to commit grand larceny and two counts of grand larceny, the trial court correctly admitted evidence of other crimes – stolen property being transported with stolen trucks – which were similar to the offenses for which appellant was convicted. Relevant law “Generally, ‘evidence which shows […]

Oct 16, 2022

Sufficient evidence of intent to maliciously wound

Where appellant was a guest in the victim’s house, was asked to leave and responded by stabbing the victim in the chest multiple times, this was sufficient evidence of intent to maliciously wound the victim. Background Appellant Puckett was a guest in Hawks’ house but was asked to leave. He did so but returned several […]

Verdicts & Settlements

See All Verdicts & Settlements

Opinion Digests

See All Digests