Quantcast
Home (page 3)

Tag Archives: Judge Wesley G. Russell Jr.

No double jeopardy violation in child pornography case (access required)

Appellant’s convictions and sentences for production of child pornography and possession of child pornography do not violate double jeopardy principles. Possession of child pornography is not a lesser-included offense of production of child pornography. Background Appellant was 17 years old ...

Read More »

Restricted movement during bank robbery was abduction (access required)

Where appellant ordered three bank employees to lie on the floor during the course of his robbery, this restriction of movement was sufficient to support independent charges of, and convictions for, abduction. Restricting the employees’ movements was not an element ...

Read More »

Conviction for violating identification ordinance reversed (access required)

Appellant’s conviction for violating a city ordinance that require a person to produce identification when “the surrounding circumstances are such as to indicate to a reasonable man that the public safety requires such identification” is reversed. The city has conceded ...

Read More »

Increased income did not warrant support modification (access required)

Where the trial court denied husband’s motion for reduced spousal support because wife acquired a job, the trial court properly determined that this was not a material change in circumstances that warranted modifying husband’s support obligation. But the trial court’s ...

Read More »

Other-acts evidence correctly admitted at burglary trial (access required)

Where the trial court admitted other-acts evidence – an uncharged burglary – at appellant’s burglary trial under the modus operandi exception to the general rule barring evidence of other criminal acts, appellant’s appeal is not properly before the court. His ...

Read More »

Accommodation defense rejected in heroin case (access required)

The circuit court correctly rejected appellant’s accommodation defense, which would have entitled him to a lesser punishment for possessing heroin with intent to distribute. The accommodation evidence offered was unrelated to the transaction for which he was convicted. Background Appellant ...

Read More »