Home (page 3)

Tag Archives: Per Curiam Opinion

SCV: Court could not assert limitations defense (access required)

Appellant Gary Pisner filed a complaint against Appellee Mark Conley, asserting breach of a written contract to perform demolition and clean-up work at his property. Pisner sought compensatory damages of $76,000. After the complaint was served and Conley failed to ...

Read More »

SCV: Expert necessary to support legal malpractice claim (access required)

A plaintiff needed to produce an expert to prove her former attorneys failed to exercise reasonable care, skill, and dispatch. She said counsel had caused her personal injury claim to become time-barred by suing the wrong entity. Background Plaintiff Gigi ...

Read More »

CAV: Child placement with willing relatives not suitable (access required)

The circuit court did not err in concluding that, despite their willingness to care for a child, the mother’s relatives were not suitable placements due to concerns about their age, health, living conditions, potential criminality, and attentiveness. Background Appellant Paula ...

Read More »

CAV: Improvements didn’t cure need for foster care (access required)

Although a mother had gotten a job, completed parenting classes, and attended counseling, her housing was not stable enough to provide care for her three young children, two of whom needed therapy. Background Appellant Misty Watkins and Johnathan Watkins are ...

Read More »

SCV: Owner could claim breach for condo’s incorporation (access required)

The owner of one unit in a condominium development stated a breach-of-contract claim against the Condominium Council, based on allegations that its Board unilaterally incorporated it into a non-stock corporation. Background According to her pleadings, Appellant Pammalla Uplinger is a ...

Read More »

4th Cir.: Enhancement improper without “overt act” predicates (access required)

The district court erred in sentencing the defendant as a career offender because his prior convictions for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine are not controlled substance offenses for career offender purposes. No career-offender predicates Appellant ...

Read More »