GOP senators say they will back Blanche confirmation after he rescinds ‘weaponization’ fund
Reuters//August 3, 2026//
Summary:
- Senators Cornyn and Tillis support Blanche nomination
- Blanche rescinds $1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund
- Fund linked to Trump lawsuit over IRS tax records
(Reuters) – Two key Republican senators said on Monday they would support Todd Blanche‘s nomination for U.S. attorney general, paving the way for his confirmation after reaching a deal that would rescind a controversial “anti-weaponization” package that was widely criticized as a slush fund for supporters of President Donald Trump.
Senators John Cornyn of Texas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina had held up Blanche’s nomination as they sought written confirmation that the Justice Department would not move forward with the $1.8-billion fund. Blanche, a former personal lawyer for Trump now serving as acting attorney general, posted a statement on social media on Sunday saying the fund had been revoked.
“We want to express our gratitude to Mr. Blanche and his staff for working with us on this, and we look forward to voting to advance his nomination out of the Senate Judiciary Committee soon,” Cornyn and Tillis said in a joint statement.
Their support likely enables the committee to advance Blanche’s nomination on Tuesday. A vote by the full Senate could come as early as Saturday, unless Democrats agree to an earlier vote.
The agreement appears to resolve one of the highest-profile Republican revolts against Trump in Congress, led by two lawmakers who are due to retire at the end of this year.
The fund was created as part of a legal settlement to resolve a $10-billion lawsuit Trump filed against his own government, alleging the Internal Revenue Service had mishandled his tax records.
Supporters say the fund was intended to compensate individuals they argue were unfairly targeted by the federal government. Critics, including Tillis and Cornyn, said it could direct taxpayer money to Trump allies, including those who assaulted police officers during the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot.
PAST TAX CLAIMS
The Republican senators had also objected to a related order that barred the IRS from auditing past tax returns for Trump, his relatives and his companies for any tax returns filed before May 18. They said they wanted clarifications to narrow to whom and how it applied to ensure Trump did not receive blanket tax immunity forever.
Blanche obliged, specifying that it only applies to Trump, his sons and the family business, and that their future tax returns could still be investigated.
“The Department has acknowledged in a binding written order that the audit settlement is limited to the plaintiffs and the scope does not extend beyond the defendants in the lawsuit, the IRS and the Treasury, addressing concerns that multiple of our Republican colleagues share,” Tillis and Cornyn said.
Blanche’s order stated that the tax order “applied by its terms only retroactively.”
Blanche has served as acting attorney general since April, when Trump fired Pam Bondi.
(Reporting by Shubham Kalia and Ananya Palyekar in Bengaluru and Dan Rosenzweig-Ziff in Washington; Editing by Andy Sullivan, Lincoln Feast, Kirsten Donovan and Alistair Bell)
Related Articles
Verdicts & Settlements
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Plaintiff injured by drunk driver
- Medical Malpractice-87-year-old dies from congestive heart failure
- Medical Malpractice – Delay in diagnosis results in multiple, complex surgeries
- Negligence and Tort – E-bike collision leads to neck injury, psoriasis flare
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – ‘Daydreaming’ driver hit plaintiff walking by road
Legal Tech
- AI is reshaping family law practice, but attorneys worry about DIY research
- Massachusetts court rejects work product protection for AI documents by girlfriend
- Exterro launches on-premises AI platform for digital forensics
Opinion Digests
- Parent and child – Mother’s parental rights to minor child are terminated
- Criminal – Man convicted of groping girls at high-school football game
- Criminal – Trial admissions doom appellate argument
- Jury and jurors – Trial court didn’t abuse discretion in refusing to strike juror
- Search and seizure – Good faith exclusionary rule applied to allegedly faulty warrants
- Criminal – Defendant convicted of murdering his roommate
- Sanctions – City has sovereign immunity against commercial owner’s claims







