Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Antitrust

Oct 1, 2024

Antitrust: Antitrust suit was filed too late

Where a freight railroad company alleged defendants violated the Sherman Act, but the allegedly anticompetitive conduct occurred in 2009 and 2010, and the suit wasn’t filed until 2018, the suit […]

Aug 23, 2024

Antitrust: Competitor claims Duke Energy engaged in anticompetitive conduct

Where the district court held an energy corporation engaged in legitimate competition to retain business, but there was evidence the company’s conduct was aimed to achieve anticompetitive ends, summary judgment […]

May 13, 2024

Antitrust: Sherman Act claims dismissed as untimely

Where plaintiffs alleged that defendants entered into an “unwritten gentlemen’s agreement” to not recruit others’ employees, in violation of the Sherman Act, but they did not file suit within the […]

Apr 27, 2018

4th Cir.: Filed nearly a decade late, collusion claim dismissed

When the Department of Justice published in the Federal Register a group effort by table saw manufacturers to develop a new safety component, a company already marketing such a component […]

Sep 28, 2017

Class Certification – Patent Protection

American Sales Company, LLC, on behalf of itself and all other similary situated, v. Pfizer, Inc., et al. (VLW 017-3-430, 36pp.) (Douglas E. Miller, J.) 2:14cv361; E.D. Va. Motion to […]

Nov 16, 2016

Manufacturer Knew About Boycott in Antitrust Claim

A company that developed and licensed its Active Injury Mitigation Technolo­gy (AIMT) for table saws cannot assert fraudulent concealment to avoid the four-year statute of limitations on its antitrust claims […]

Sep 28, 2015

Saw Company Group Boycott Claim Survives

Plaintiff table-saw manufacturer states an antitrust claim by alleging defendant manufacturers voted to engage in a group boycott of plaintiff’s “active injury mitigation technology” in an effort to reduce their […]

Jun 21, 2013

High cost no bar to class arbitration waiver

Merchants who wanted to use a class action to sue a credit-card company for antitrust violations cannot cite the expense of individual arbitration to avoid a class-action waiver clause, the […]

Jun 5, 2013

Dental Board Action Violates Antitrust Law

A state agency that regulates the practice of dentistry cannot overturn a Federal Trade Commission decision that the agency’s efforts to shut down teeth-whitening services performed by non-dentists constituted unfair […]

Sep 17, 2012

No Antitrust Claims for Service Station Owners

In this case from Alexandria U.S. District Court, defendant lessors of gasoline dealerships to plaintiff service stations win summary judgment on plaintiffs’ antitrust claims as well as their claims for […]

May 22, 2012

Brokers Sued Over MLS Operation

The 4th Circuit says plaintiff buyers of real estate brokerage services in South Carolina have stated an antitrust claim under the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, with allegations that […]

Apr 17, 2012

DuPont Win in Monopolization Case

In this lengthy litigation between DuPont and Kolon Industries over trade secrets and confidential information concerning para-aramid fiber, a Richmond U.S. District Court grants summary judgment to DuPont on Kolon’s […]

Legal Tech

See All Legal Tech News

Verdicts & Settlements

See All Verdicts & Settlements

Opinion Digests

See All Digests