Quantcast
Home (page 4)

Tag Archives: Intellectual Property

Transfer of patent inventor suit to California denied (access required)

Where the parties’ relationship in a patent inventorship dispute was centered on conduct and activities in Taiwan and China, and where specific jurisdiction was lacking, the motion to transfer the dispute to the Northern District of California was denied. Background ...

Read More »

Russian owner of ‘stream-stripping’ websites may be subject to jurisdiction (access required)

The Russian owner of “stream-ripping” websites, which allow audio extraction from videos, should have known he could be sued in Virginia based upon the volume of visitors from Virginia and his other contacts with the United States. On remand, the ...

Read More »

Cox can’t avoid $1 billion verdict, but can attempt to reduce award (access required)

In a copyright infringement suit brought by members of the music industry against Cox Communications, the jury’s award of $99,830 for each of the infringing works was supported by the evidence and was not unconstitutional. However, Cox will have an ...

Read More »

Seller of fake Lamborghini products must pay $6 million judgment (access required)

A man sued for allegedly marketing and selling counterfeit Lamborghini-marked merchandise failed to show he was improperly served or that default was improperly entered. Where the owners of the Lamborghini trademark and corporate affiliates sufficiently pleaded trademark and false designation ...

Read More »

Franchisor awarded most of attorneys’ fees, costs in trademark suit (access required)

Franchisees of urgent care centers who continued using the trademarks, service marks and a franchise system without authorization must pay most of the plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees. The claimed partner hourly rate of $400 and associate rate of $200-275 per hour ...

Read More »

Attorneys’ fees denied where Lanham Act case was not ‘exceptional’ (access required)

Although the defendants prevailed at summary judgment by demonstrating the Lanham Act claims were time-barred, attorneys’ fees were denied because the plaintiff’s claims were not frivolous or objectively unreasonable, its litigation approach was not so unreasonable as to render it ...

Read More »

Disputed terms in patent challenge resolved after Markman hearing (access required)

Following a Markman hearing, 18 disputed terms in a patent challenge involving medical devices intended primarily for use in spinal surgery were construed, with the majority of terms given their plain and ordinary meaning. Background At issue in this case ...

Read More »

Affirmative defenses not subject to ‘Twombly’ and ‘Iqbal’ (access required)

Although prior decisions applied the pleading standards in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), to affirmative defenses, the recent trend declines to do so. But, even under the less-stringent ...

Read More »