Virginia’s Go To Lawyers – Medical Malpractice: William E. Artz
Virginia Lawyers Weekly//December 22, 2021//

Attorney, William E. Artz PC
McLean
Education:
JD, Washington College of Law at American University
Best known for:
Careful case selection and the retaining of qualified, capable experts.
Signature case/representation:
Estate of Eleanor Browder v. Donna Gamache M.D. et al. This was a negligently delayed diagnosis of breast cancer resulting in metastatic spread of the cancer to an incurable stage. Had she been diagnosed in a timely fashion by appropriate care she had a high probability of cure. Mrs. Browder left a husband and three grown children. The jury found negligence and causation and awarded Mr. Browder $7.5 million which included $6.5 million for solace.
Satisfying aspect of practice:
Being able to offer cathartic and financial assistance to patients and their families devastated by medical catastrophe.
Working with clients:
The key here is to listen and gently advise the client about the critical legal areas of their case. Remaining unemotional is important in enabling you to provide clear, succinct and understandable legal advice. The foregoing is our job as an attorney.
Advice:
Over-prepare your case in advance of trial.
Outlook:
My hope would be to see the medical malpractice cap repealed by the legislature or overturned by a federal or state appellate court.
Legal Tech
- How large language models are leveling the personal injury playing field
- Attorney Share, Lawmatics integrate to automate law firm referrals
- How ransomware tactics against law firms are changing
Verdicts & Settlements
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Motorcyclist suffers severe injuries in vehicle accident
- Medical Malpractice – Patient dies after alleged improper medicine admin
- Workers’ Compensation-Vehicle accident paralyzes Brazilian cement worker
- Medical Malpractice – Death from cancer followed stomach pain misdiagnosis
- Workers’ Compensation – Seasonal worker paralyzed in tobacco baler accident
Opinion Digests
- Criminal – Defendant convicted based upon Commonwealth witnesses’ testimony
- Zoning – Party failed to show its due process rights were violated
- Tort – Jury’s zero-damages verdict for inmate plaintiff affirmed
- Parent and child – Record supported termination of mother’s parental rights
- Criminal – Man convicted of grand larceny after stealing $26,000
- Parent and child – Brothers dispute who should be their mother’s guardian
- Tort – Allegedly defamatory statements lacked the requisite “sting”







