Tort- School officials dodge suit over adult’s assault of minor child
Virginia Lawyers Weekly//May 4, 2026//
Although a school bus assistant bit a minor child and struck him in the head, the court dismissed his guardian’s suit alleging that school board members were grossly negligent by not training the assistant and in failing to share information about the child’s behavioral issues. The assistant’s actions were not reasonably foreseeable.
Background
G.H., by his guardian and next friend Janet Rance, appeals the circuit court’s judgment sustaining Tania Sotomayor, Sean F. Barnes, Chris Sprouse and Euodias Falcon Knight III’s demurrer to his second amended complaint. He argues the circuit court erred in holding that his claims for gross negligence and a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 were legally insufficient.
Analysis
G.H. asserted that the employees were grossly negligent and violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights because a bus driver assistant, Adela Lucia, was not properly trained and the employees failed to share information pertaining to G.H.’s specific conditions with Avila or the bus driver.
But the operative complaint is devoid of allegations suggesting that Avila had a history of violent criminal behavior or child abuse. Absent allegations of this kind, Avila’s conduct in striking and biting G.H. could not have been reasonably foreseeable. Since Avila’s actions were not reasonably foreseeable, the employees were under no duty of care to protect G.H. from Avila.
Likewise, since the employees were not aware of any history of violent acts by Avila, they had no reason to know that Avila would respond to G.H.’s misbehavior in this manner. When the employees assigned Avila to be G.H.’s bus driver assistant, they did not “disregard[] a known or obvious consequence” of doing so. Without “actual notice” that Avila would assault G.H. in this manner, the employees were not deliberately indifferent to G.H.’s Fourteenth Amendment rights.
Affirmed.
G.H. v. Sotomayor, Record No. 0045-25-1, April 21, 2026. CAV (unpublished opinion) (Callins). From the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach (Farashahi). Kevin E. Martingayle (Jerrell R. Johnson; Bischoff Martingayle, P.C., on briefs), for appellant. Melissa Y. York (Jeremy D. Capps; Brian P. Ettari; Harman, Claytor, Corrigan & Wellman, on brief), for appellees. VLW 026-7-154. 7 pp.
VLW 026-7-154
Virginia Lawyers Weekly
Legal Tech
- AI in practice: How new technology is affecting litigation practice
- Experts foresee legal malpractice risk for those who eschew AI
- Legal Decoder launches AI-powered billing analytics interface
Verdicts & Settlements
- Negligence and Tort – E-bike collision leads to neck injury, psoriasis flare
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – ‘Daydreaming’ driver hit plaintiff walking by road
- Motor Vehicle Negligence 92-year-old dies after being hit by vehicle
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Motorcyclist suffers severe injuries in vehicle accident
- Medical Malpractice – Patient dies after alleged improper medicine admin
Opinion Digests
- Criminal – Doctor convicted of unauthorized distribution of oxycodone
- Tort – Assault and battery claims against postal employee are dismissed
- Immigration – Petitioner failed to connect fear of persecution to PSG
- Civil Procedure – District court won’t revisit three-year old decision
- Bankruptcy – Pro se debtor’s myriad motions and challenges are denied
- Criminal – Firearm possession sentence was not substantively unreasonable
- Appeals – Inmate’s untimely appeal is dismissed







