Free Newsletter
022-7-156 – Camden v. Commonwealth
Virginia Lawyers Weekly//July 19, 2022//
Camden v. Commonwealth, Record No. 1056-21-3, May 24, 2022. CAV (per curiam) From the Circuit Court of Botetourt County (Trumbo). Scott E. Gardner for appellant. Jason S. Miyares for appellee. VLW 022-7-156, 6 pp. Unpublished opinion.
Related Content
Verdicts & Settlements
- Fraud – Jury sides with couple in home construction case
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Triathlete suffered fractures after being struck by pickup truck
- Medical Malpractice- Nursing facility patient died after falling, suffering head injury
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Sales manager sustained multiple injuires in Virginia Beach collision
- Products Liability – Workplace accident results in amputation at the wrist
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Railroad worker injured in collision with tractor-trailer
- Workers’ Compensation – Worker sustains back injuries following fall, seeks PTD
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Intersection accident results in bodily injury, stroke
- Workers’ Compensation – Coal miner reaches deal for black lung disease disability
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Driver dies after intersection accident with another vehicle
- Medical Malpractice – Jury sides with doctor on med/mal allegations
Opinion Digests
- Employment – City of Virginia Beach must pay fees and costs to prevailing Title VII plaintiff
- Contract – Lack of mutual assent dooms motion to enforce agreement
- Tort – Court refuses to reverse defamation verdict
- Criminal – Second motion for sentence reduction is denied
- Real Property – Commercial use of property violated Declaration of Covenants
- Employment – Professor’s race discrimination and work environment claims are dismissed
- Constitutional – Search of probationer’s house was unlawful
- Retirement – Class was wrongly certified in breach of fiduciary duty ERISA suit
- Negligence – Coach defeats student’s claim of gross negligence
- Criminal – Defendant convicted for knowingly submitting false immigration documents
- Prisons – District court did not err when it construed inmate’s pro se complaint
- Fraud – Defendants prevail on qui tam suit
