Premises Liability – Severe injuries require ongoing care after incident
$8.25 million settlement
Virginia Lawyers Weekly//March 30, 2026//
Mediator: Scott Kurlander
Date resolved: Jan. 30, 2026
Amount: $8.25 million
Attorneys for plaintiff: Ryan E. Wind and Kevin T. Hadden, Richmond, Wind Injury Law; Les S. Bowers and Ashley Davis, Charlottesville, MichieHamlett
Case description: This case involved a highly contested premises liability claim. The subject incident resulted in severe injuries that will require ongoing care for the injured victim. Due to the unique nature of the claim, all other facts are confidential.
Related Articles
Verdicts & Settlements
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Unicycle rider dies after being hit by car
- Premises Liability – Delivery driver injured by porch decking collapse
- Premises Liability – Fall down stairs at resort results in injuries, death
- Medical Malpractice – Jurors side with doctor in suit over rescue surgery
- Workers’ Compensation- Seasonal worker paralyzed in tobacco baler accident
- Medical Malpractice- Death from cancer followed stomach pain misdiagnosis
- Workers’ Compensation – Struck in face by forklift, woman suffers brain injury
- Negligence and Tort – Group home resident falls, sustaining femur fracture
- Medical Malpractice – Nursing facility patient dies after fracturing ankle in fall
- Medical Malpractice- Patient has bladder injury during colostomy reversal
- Premises Liability- Apartment guest burned by gas grill spewing fire
Opinion Digests
- Criminal Practice – Deliberate Indifference to Inmate’s Serious Medical Needs – Actual and Probable Cause
- The Most Important Opinions, January-June 2026
- Criminal – Court of Appeals wrongly vacated murder conviction
- Tort – U.Va. prevails on former professor’s claims
- Constitutional – Company’s due process claim against county is dismissed
- Administrative – Plaintiffs’ effort to enjoin ITC proceeding fails
- Patent and trademark – Amazon patent infringement suit transferred to New Jersey
- Tort – Chesterfield County dismissed from wrongful death suit
- Consumer Protection – Lawsuit over kratom survives motion to dismiss
- Criminal – Defendant convicted of attempted sexual exploitation of a child
- Evidence – Motion to exclude transmission expert is rejected
- Damages – Court awards pre-judgment interest following parties’ acquiescence







