Dos and don’ts when an employee is arrested
Virginia Lawyers Weekly//August 24, 2022//
You’ve just received notice that an employee has been arrested. A local news outlet is calling to confirm the person’s employment history and the employee rumor mill is already active. Now what?
First consult legal counsel, inside or outside your company. If the incident is mishandled, you run the risk of defamation or discrimination claims. Your attorney can advise you on next steps.
Pay attention to the following:
Don’t make assumptions. Remember, an arrest is simply an accusation. It is not proof of wrongdoing. Knee-jerk reactions can cause bigger problems down the road, particularly if the employee is later cleared. Allow the person a chance to explain. If desired, conduct an internal investigation to determine if the information the employee provided is reliable.
Manage information on a need-to-know basis. Exercise caution in how you gather information and be careful not to spread misinformation. Only employees with supervisory or decision-making roles should be included in conversations regarding an employee’s arrest. Unnecessary disclosure could lead to a defamation suit if the employee is found innocent or the charges are later dropped.
Determine impact on the employee’s job. An employer can make employment decisions based on the conduct underlying the arrest if it makes an employee unfit for the position. For example, an arrest for a DUI does not relate to someone’s duty as a receptionist, but it may warrant termination for a bus driver or a delivery driver. Meanwhile, an arrest for check fraud would be relevant to someone involved in an accounting or money-handling functions.
If there is a clear and justifiable conflict between the nature of the employee’s job and the alleged offense, you may want to put the employee on suspension during an investigation. Alternately, it may be appropriate to move them, at least temporarily, into a less public role.
Remain consistent. Make sure any employment actions you take are consistent with how other employees with similar arrests and similar job functions have been treated.
Consider policies addressing arrests. Some employers maintain specific policies for instances of arrest and incarceration. Under such policies, you may require that an employee report an arrest, and that misrepresentation of the circumstances can serve as grounds for dismissal.
Be aware, however, that a policy that automatically suspends or terminates an employee after an arrest may run afoul of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission laws. Make sure you understand what’s allowed under federal law and the laws of your state and/or local municipality.
Verdicts & Settlements
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Unicycle rider dies after being hit by car
- Premises Liability – Delivery driver injured by porch decking collapse
- Premises Liability – Fall down stairs at resort results in injuries, death
- Medical Malpractice – Jurors side with doctor in suit over rescue surgery
- Workers’ Compensation- Seasonal worker paralyzed in tobacco baler accident
- Medical Malpractice- Death from cancer followed stomach pain misdiagnosis
- Workers’ Compensation – Struck in face by forklift, woman suffers brain injury
- Negligence and Tort – Group home resident falls, sustaining femur fracture
- Medical Malpractice – Nursing facility patient dies after fracturing ankle in fall
- Medical Malpractice- Patient has bladder injury during colostomy reversal
- Premises Liability- Apartment guest burned by gas grill spewing fire
Opinion Digests
- Criminal Practice – Deliberate Indifference to Inmate’s Serious Medical Needs – Actual and Probable Cause
- The Most Important Opinions, January-June 2026
- Criminal – Court of Appeals wrongly vacated murder conviction
- Tort – U.Va. prevails on former professor’s claims
- Constitutional – Company’s due process claim against county is dismissed
- Administrative – Plaintiffs’ effort to enjoin ITC proceeding fails
- Patent and trademark – Amazon patent infringement suit transferred to New Jersey
- Tort – Chesterfield County dismissed from wrongful death suit
- Consumer Protection – Lawsuit over kratom survives motion to dismiss
- Criminal – Defendant convicted of attempted sexual exploitation of a child
- Evidence – Motion to exclude transmission expert is rejected
- Damages – Court awards pre-judgment interest following parties’ acquiescence







