EEOC sues FedEx over failure to accommodate blind employees
BridgeTower Media Newswires//July 9, 2026//
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has filed a disability discrimination lawsuit against FedEx, alleging that the company failed to provide reasonable accommodations to blind employees at a facility in Kernersville in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The case highlights employers’ obligations not only to provide reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities, but also to engage in a meaningful interactive process to identify effective solutions.
According to the EEOC, the lawsuit involves four blind package handlers and a broader class of similarly situated employees working at FedEx’s Kernersville facility.
The agency alleges that the employees requested multiple accommodations to help them safely navigate the workplace and perform essential job functions, including tactile floor markings, accessible training materials, improved lighting and screen-reader technology.
The EEOC claims that FedEx either denied or failed to adequately implement those accommodations over an extended period, limiting the employees’ ability to access workstations, break areas and restrooms on the same basis as sighted employees.
The agency also alleges deficiencies in the company’s recordkeeping relating to accommodation requests.
FedEx has stated that it is reviewing the lawsuit and remains committed to complying with the ADA.
Interactive process
The lawsuit serves as a reminder that ADA compliance extends beyond simply offering some accommodation. Employers are generally expected to engage in a good-faith interactive process with employees to identify accommodations that effectively address workplace barriers without creating undue hardship.
Courts and enforcement agencies often focus heavily on whether employers meaningfully evaluated accommodation requests, explored alternatives and documented their decision-making.
It is also important to remember that accessibility concerns may arise in both physical work environments and digital systems, making it increasingly important for employers to consider workplace access holistically.
Verdicts & Settlements
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Unicycle rider dies after being hit by car
- Premises Liability – Delivery driver injured by porch decking collapse
- Premises Liability – Fall down stairs at resort results in injuries, death
- Medical Malpractice – Jurors side with doctor in suit over rescue surgery
- Workers’ Compensation- Seasonal worker paralyzed in tobacco baler accident
- Medical Malpractice- Death from cancer followed stomach pain misdiagnosis
- Workers’ Compensation – Struck in face by forklift, woman suffers brain injury
- Negligence and Tort – Group home resident falls, sustaining femur fracture
- Medical Malpractice – Nursing facility patient dies after fracturing ankle in fall
- Medical Malpractice- Patient has bladder injury during colostomy reversal
- Premises Liability- Apartment guest burned by gas grill spewing fire
Opinion Digests
- The Most Important Opinions, January-June 2026
- Criminal – Court of Appeals wrongly vacated murder conviction
- Tort – U.Va. prevails on former professor’s claims
- Constitutional – Company’s due process claim against county is dismissed
- Administrative – Plaintiffs’ effort to enjoin ITC proceeding fails
- Patent and trademark – Amazon patent infringement suit transferred to New Jersey
- Tort – Chesterfield County dismissed from wrongful death suit
- Consumer Protection – Lawsuit over kratom survives motion to dismiss
- Criminal – Defendant convicted of attempted sexual exploitation of a child
- Evidence – Motion to exclude transmission expert is rejected
- Damages – Court awards pre-judgment interest following parties’ acquiescence
- Employment – Court approves overtime wage collective action settlement







