To attract more ‘seasoned’ lawyers to bench, pensions being studied
Peter Vieth//February 17, 2020//

Senators from both parties spoke as one last month to lament financial disincentives that keep many experienced private practice lawyers from applying for judgeships.
“It is a big issue,” said Sen. Ryan McDougle, R-Mechanicsville. “We will continue to be forced to rely on individuals who have limited practice experience to go on the bench because they are the only people who can financially afford to do it,” he told fellow senators on Jan. 28.
McDougle put in Senate Bill 606 that would have increased the retirement multiplier from 1.00% to 1.70% for new judges. The multiplier applies to years of service for calculating the vesting date for retirement.
But amid uncertainty about the best path through the maze of numbers provided by the Virginia Retirement System, McDougle had the bill carried over to next year to allow the Supreme Court, the Judicial Council and the VRS to study the figures.
“I want the concept to have a full vetting, rather than just jam through the version I came up with,” McDougle said Feb. 5.
The Supreme Court is supportive of reform.
“The court supports any reasonable bill that will improve judicial retirement benefits and attract highly qualified attorneys to the bench,” said a spokesperson for the Supreme Court on Jan. 30.
Lawmakers also lamented that the most viable candidates for many open judgeships are commonwealth’s attorneys, public defenders and legislators themselves. All are already in the state retirement system, building up years of service.
Other than those candidates, “the only people who will vest in the system are people who become judges in their 30s, when they’re clearly not ready to be judges,” said Sen. Creigh Deeds, D-Warm Springs.
“A lot of people think we’ve been putting people on the bench too soon, too early, and they get burned out,” said Sen. John Edwards, D-Roanoke. “I’m glad to see we’re looking into this issue.”
– Peter Vieth
Verdicts & Settlements
- Medical Malpractice – Jurors side with doctor in suit over rescue surgery
- Workers’ Compensation- Seasonal worker paralyzed in tobacco baler accident
- Medical Malpractice- Death from cancer followed stomach pain misdiagnosis
- Workers’ Compensation – Struck in face by forklift, woman suffers brain injury
- Negligence and Tort – Group home resident falls, sustaining femur fracture
- Medical Malpractice – Nursing facility patient dies after fracturing ankle in fall
- Medical Malpractice- Patient has bladder injury during colostomy reversal
- Premises Liability- Apartment guest burned by gas grill spewing fire
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Physician sustained hand injuries in crash
- Premises Liability- Dog bite injury nets settlement
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Woman suffers injuries after T-bone collision
Opinion Digests
- Criminal – Court of Appeals wrongly vacated murder conviction
- Tort – U.Va. prevails on former professor’s claims
- Constitutional – Company’s due process claim against county is dismissed
- Administrative – Plaintiffs’ effort to enjoin ITC proceeding fails
- Patent and trademark – Amazon patent infringement suit transferred to New Jersey
- Tort – Chesterfield County dismissed from wrongful death suit
- Consumer Protection – Lawsuit over kratom survives motion to dismiss
- Criminal – Defendant convicted of attempted sexual exploitation of a child
- Evidence – Motion to exclude transmission expert is rejected
- Damages – Court awards pre-judgment interest following parties’ acquiescence
- Employment – Court approves overtime wage collective action settlement
- Search & Seizure – Warrantless search of hotel room safe upheld







