Quantcast

Tag Archives: Judge Mary Grace O’Brien

Jury correctly instructed on uncorroborated testimony (access required)

Where the trial court instructed the jury that it could convict appellant for rape and forcible sodomy solely on the victim’s uncorroborated testimony “if believed,” this was a correct statement of the law. The convictions are affirmed. Background Appellant met ...

Read More »

Evidence did not support shoulder injury award (access required)

Where there was no medical diagnosis or testimony from claimant that she ever actually injured her shoulder, the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Commission incorrectly awarded her benefits. “[T]here is no credible evidence that she ‘suffered an actual mechanical or structural change ...

Read More »

Math teacher’s vision issues precluded return to work (access required)

The Virginia Workers’ Compensation Commission correctly rejected a school district’s argument that a math teacher could return to work despite vision issues arising from her fall in a school parking lot. Overview Claimant suffered a concussion when she fell. She ...

Read More »

Fraudulent failure to return leased property (access required)

The trial court correctly convicted appellant of fraudulently failing to return rental property based on the rental agreement, a demand letter and circumstantial evidence showing appellant’s “evasive and uncommunicative conduct.” Background Taking the evidence in a light most favorable to ...

Read More »

Sufficient evidence supports child neglect conviction (access required)

Appellant’s conviction of child neglect is affirmed. There is sufficient evidence that appellant knew his son needed medical care and that his wife was not taking him to scheduled medical appointments. Yet, appellant “did nothing” to obtain medical care for ...

Read More »

Evidence properly admitted at internet sex crimes trial (access required)

Appellant’s motion to suppress his sexually explicit internet chats with a police officer, who was posing as a 13-year-old girl, was correctly denied. The electronic communications were not obtained in violation of the wiretap act. Further, appellant was not in ...

Read More »