Barge company held liable in death of sailor in James – $1,250,000 Verdict
Virginia Lawyers Weekly//September 20, 2010//
While taking part in training exercises on the James River, decedent Freddie Porter, a storekeeper seaman in the U.S. Navy, was killed when his rigid-hulled inflatable boats (RHIBs) was struck by one of an array of barges being towed by the tug William E. Poole. He was thrown overboard and died when he was sucked under the eight-barge array and drawn into the tugs propeller. Decedent’s craft was one of three Navy RHIBs taking part in a coxswains training exercise.
Vulcan Materials, as owner of the tug and barges, filed a limitation action, and claimant’s mother, Cassita Massiah, filed the death claim in response. The United States was impleaded by Vulcan as well. The case was tried pursuant to general maritime law, and the evidence was strongly disputed by the parties on the issues of responsibility under the Inland Rules of Navigation, sovereign immunity and the measure of damages, including the choice of law.
Massiah claimed that the tug, which was pushing eight barges on a dark night in a narrow channel in bad weather, should have posted a lookout, particularly since the barges and tug in the array presented the captain with a 600-foot blind spot. Vulcan claimed the Navy was solely responsible and the seamen were in the channel without justification and were poorly trained operating the vessels without sufficient lighting. The United States claimed immunity and the court heard all of the evidence in a five-day trial.
The court held that the United States was 80 percent liable and Vulcan 20 percent liable, and that Vulcan’s failure to properly post a lookout had caused the collision. The United States motion to be dismissed was granted post trial. Damages of $1,250,000 were awarded to the estate which consisted of parents and siblings.
Vulcan was held to be liable for the full award. The court applied the Virginia Wrongful Death Act in light of the situs of the death and the decedent’s status as a non-seafarer given his job description.
The matter has been appealed by Vulcan to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
[10-T-136]
Type of action: Admiralty
Type of action: Wrongful death
Name of case: In the Matter of the Complaint of Vulcan Materials Co.
Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division
Case no.: 2:08-cv-00377
Tried before: Judge
Name of judge: Henry Morgan
Verdict or Settlement: Verdict
Amount: $1,250,000
Date: Dec. 17, 2009
Demand: $1,500,000
Highest offer: None
Experts: Capt. Mitchell Stoller – duties of the tug owner and captain
Plaintiff’s attorneys: Daniel Rose, New York; Michael F. Imprevento, Norfolk
Verdicts & Settlements
- Medical Malpractice – Jurors side with doctor in suit over rescue surgery
- Workers’ Compensation- Seasonal worker paralyzed in tobacco baler accident
- Medical Malpractice- Death from cancer followed stomach pain misdiagnosis
- Workers’ Compensation – Struck in face by forklift, woman suffers brain injury
- Negligence and Tort – Group home resident falls, sustaining femur fracture
- Medical Malpractice – Nursing facility patient dies after fracturing ankle in fall
- Medical Malpractice- Patient has bladder injury during colostomy reversal
- Premises Liability- Apartment guest burned by gas grill spewing fire
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Physician sustained hand injuries in crash
- Premises Liability- Dog bite injury nets settlement
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Woman suffers injuries after T-bone collision
Opinion Digests
- Criminal – Court of Appeals wrongly vacated murder conviction
- Tort – U.Va. prevails on former professor’s claims
- Constitutional – Company’s due process claim against county is dismissed
- Administrative – Plaintiffs’ effort to enjoin ITC proceeding fails
- Patent and trademark – Amazon patent infringement suit transferred to New Jersey
- Tort – Chesterfield County dismissed from wrongful death suit
- Consumer Protection – Lawsuit over kratom survives motion to dismiss
- Criminal – Defendant convicted of attempted sexual exploitation of a child
- Evidence – Motion to exclude transmission expert is rejected
- Damages – Court awards pre-judgment interest following parties’ acquiescence
- Employment – Court approves overtime wage collective action settlement
- Search & Seizure – Warrantless search of hotel room safe upheld







