Court won’t dismiss felon in possession indictment
Virginia Lawyers Weekly//July 7, 2023//
Where a defendant indicted for being a felon in possession of a firearm argued the statute upon which the indictment was based was unconstitutional following New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022), his motion to dismiss the indictment was denied. This court and dozens of courts around the nation have considered the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) in the wake of Bruen, and none have found the statute facially unconstitutional.
Background
Before the court is a motion to dismiss the indictment against the defendant, Donovan Henry Kearney. The motion avers that the statute upon which the indictment is based, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), which prohibits felons from possessing firearms, is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment and the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision.
Analysis
The defendant argues that the Supreme Court’s decision in Bruen “marked a dramatic shift in Second Amendment law.” He argues that his “possession of a firearm comes within the Second Amendment’s plain text,” meaning that “his conduct is presumptively protected” unless the government can show that 922(g)(1) is “consistent with American tradition.”
The defendant acknowledges that “this Court denied a similar motion in United States v. Finney, No. 2:23-cr-13, 2023 WL 2696203 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2023),” and that two other courts in this district “have considered and denied similar arguments.” Dozens of courts around this nation have considered the constitutionality of section 922(g)(1) in the wake of Bruen, and none have found the statute facially unconstitutional. But the defendant urges this court to arrive at a different conclusion.
As the defendant recognizes, this court has already carefully considered and denied each of the arguments set forth in the motion, as have other judges in this district. Today, this court declines to change course.
United States v. Kearney, Case No. 4:23-cr-29, June 9, 2023. EDVA at Newport News (Walker). VLW 023-3-329. 5 pp.
Verdicts & Settlements
- Medical Malpractice – Jurors side with doctor in suit over rescue surgery
- Workers’ Compensation- Seasonal worker paralyzed in tobacco baler accident
- Medical Malpractice- Death from cancer followed stomach pain misdiagnosis
- Workers’ Compensation – Struck in face by forklift, woman suffers brain injury
- Negligence and Tort – Group home resident falls, sustaining femur fracture
- Medical Malpractice – Nursing facility patient dies after fracturing ankle in fall
- Medical Malpractice- Patient has bladder injury during colostomy reversal
- Premises Liability- Apartment guest burned by gas grill spewing fire
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Physician sustained hand injuries in crash
- Premises Liability- Dog bite injury nets settlement
- Motor Vehicle Negligence – Woman suffers injuries after T-bone collision
Opinion Digests
- Criminal – Court of Appeals wrongly vacated murder conviction
- Tort – U.Va. prevails on former professor’s claims
- Constitutional – Company’s due process claim against county is dismissed
- Administrative – Plaintiffs’ effort to enjoin ITC proceeding fails
- Patent and trademark – Amazon patent infringement suit transferred to New Jersey
- Tort – Chesterfield County dismissed from wrongful death suit
- Consumer Protection – Lawsuit over kratom survives motion to dismiss
- Criminal – Defendant convicted of attempted sexual exploitation of a child
- Evidence – Motion to exclude transmission expert is rejected
- Damages – Court awards pre-judgment interest following parties’ acquiescence
- Employment – Court approves overtime wage collective action settlement
- Search & Seizure – Warrantless search of hotel room safe upheld







